His Holiness the Dalai Lama during the first day of the Dialogue between Russian and Buddhist Scholars in Dharamsala, India on May 3, 2018. Photo: TPI/Yeshe Choesang

Science
Typography
  • Smaller Small Medium Big Bigger
  • Default Helvetica Segoe Georgia Times

Dharamshala, India — “We need a scientific approach to the promotion of warmheartedness. This work may not bring quick results and I may not live to see them, but those in their 30s now may see the emergence of a more peaceful human population," His Holiness the Dalai Lama told the Russian scientists at the conclusion of a two-day dialogue between Russian and Buddhist Scholars at the Main Tibetan Temple in Dharamshala, India on May 4, 2018.

“I usually make a distinction,” His Holiness replied, “between Buddhist science and Buddhist religious practice. Religious practice is a private matter, but the insights of Buddhist science should be available to everyone. Buddhist science as exemplified by the Nalanda Tradition is a result of logical investigation. In Dharmakirti’s explanation of the four noble truths in the second chapter of his ‘Commentary on Valid Cognition’ he mentions that even after you have established a valid inference it is still necessary to develop experience.

“As I mentioned yesterday, the Buddha’s teaching is founded on an understanding of reality. The theory of selflessness and the explanation that self is designated on the basis of body and mind imply that if the mind changes the self changes," said the spiritual leader of Tibet, who has been engaged with scientists for the last 20 years regularly attending Mind Science symposiums where dialogue between him and the world’s top scientists have taken place.

“Nagarjuna stated that what the Buddha taught is based on the two truths, the conventional truth of appearances and the truth of ultimate reality. On the basis of understanding the path is developed. I don’t talk about a dialogue between science and Buddhism, but of a conversation between modern science and Buddhist science. We discuss what is evident to everyone.

“The use of logic and valid cognition preceded the emergence of Buddhism, which is why I prefer to refer to the body of knowledge derived from ancient India. Non-theistic traditions like Buddhism, Jainism and a branch of the Samkhyas don’t accept a creator. They hold that the future depends on the quality of your own action and that whether that action is positive or negative depends on your motivation. This means we have to take psychology into account. We can transform our minds through awareness.”

Ninety year old Prof David Dubrovsky, a philosopher of science, who also attended the first Dialogue between Russian and Buddhist Scholars last year, asked what His Holiness knows of new methods for studying the brain like narrow band imaging and his view of technological convergence. His Holiness told him that he has met some scientists who imagine that it may eventually be possible to generate consciousness through technological development. In other words, to create something like a sentient being with artificial intelligence.

“I doubt, that such a feat is possible,” His Holiness made clear. “The origin of technology is the human mind after all. However, if it were possible to create beings without anger, they’d be welcome, but I really don’t think it will happen.”

Prof Dubrovsky told him that he seeks to show that the Buddhist description of the experience of consciousness does not contradict science—they share a common conceptual platform. However, consciousness has a subjective aspect and subjective reality is a problem for science. He quoted approvingly from ‘Universe in a Single Atom’ His Holiness’s suggestion that there needs to be a way of combining objective lived experience with subjective experience. An ability to control our thoughts allows an ability to control our own brains.

Dubrovsky declared that he doubts the assertion that the human mind is essentially pure, that it essentially includes no negative aspects. However, he conceded there is an urgent need to learn how to transform the human mind and that it is important to take an optimistic view of this.

In his response His Holiness observed, “Everyone wants to live a happy life. Indeed every human being has a right to live a happy life. But there is a difference between happiness on a mental level and happiness on a physical or sensory level. At present our education systems are inadequate because they tend to take account only of material or sensory goals. What distinguishes human beings from animals is our mental experience, but this faculty can be misused. Monkeys may fight among themselves, but they don’t mobilise thousands to kill each other like people do.

“Therefore our education systems should teach more about the workings of our minds and emotions, and they should do so in the context of secular values. People’s wish to live in peace relates to their minds. That’s why I’m fully committed to making the psychological knowledge of ancient India more available. I believe that India can combine modern and ancient knowledge for the general benefit.

“We need a scientific approach to the promotion of warmheartedness. And we need to convince people of the need to tackle anger. This work may not bring quick results and I may not live to see them, but those in their 30s now may see the emergence of a more peaceful human population.

“What’s more, whereas in the early days the development of nuclear weapons excited some scientists, because of a popular yearning for genuine peace, we now need to find ways of eliminating them. Scientists can certainly contribute to creating a better more compassionate world and generally people will pay attention to what they have to say.

Dr Namdol Lhamo of the Men-tsee-khang, the Tibetan Medical and Astro-science Institute, who had been invited to make a presentation on Understanding the World in the context of the Tibetan medical tradition, stated that a Tibetan physician examines three principal energies: wind, characterised as light, moving energy; bile, which is associated with heat and phlegm, the character of which is cold, moist and heavy. When there is an imbalance among these energies the patient is unwell. Introducing the black and white vital channels, she explained that while the black category includes veins, arteries, blood vessels and so forth, the white category refers to the brain and nervous system.

Prof Victoria Lysenko, a Russian specialist in Indian and Buddhist philosophy, who His Holiness has met before, asked if it is true that he feels Buddhist science correlates with modern science, but Buddhist philosophy and meditation practice are of concern only to Buddhists.

Ninety year old Prof David Dubrovsky, a philosopher of science, who also attended the first Dialogue between Russian and Buddhist Scholars last year, asked what His Holiness knows of new methods for studying the brain like narrow band imaging and his view of technological convergence. His Holiness told him that he has met some scientists who imagine that it may eventually be possible to generate consciousness through technological development. In other words, to create something like a sentient being with artificial intelligence.

“I doubt, that such a feat is possible,” His Holiness made clear. “The origin of technology is the human mind after all. However, if it were possible to create beings without anger, they’d be welcome, but I really don’t think it will happen.”

At the conclusion of the two-day dialogue between Russian and Buddhist scholars, His Holiness expressed his hope that they should meet the Russian scholars again in Moscow. “This has been the second of our meetings—I hope we may all meet again and that one day such a gathering may take place in Moscow.” The warm applause that greeted this statement indicated that the hope is widely shared.

Cheap & Effective Advertising
E-mail: editor@thetibetpost.com